ECCCE History

Functions of ECCCE

8 Key Concerns

The Past 20 Years

People Behind

Past Chairmen

Chairman's Report
Annual Report
Report to Rome

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAIRMAN'S REPORT TO ROME

 

Paper delivered by
His Excellency Most Rev. Leonardo Z. Legaspi, OP, DD
Chairman
Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education
of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines

 


Catechesis and Catholic Education in the Philippines:
The Reality in Context and the Strategic Response
_____________________________________________________

 

“God is opening before the Church the horizons of a humanity more fully prepared for the sowing of the Gospel.” This vision of a new and promising horizon I see being fulfilled in Asia, where Jesus was born and where Christianity began (Ecclesia in Asia # 9, paragraph 8). This consoling word from His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, enthused me to share with you the Catechetical and Catholic Education landscape of the Church in the Philippines today. In spite of our troubled world situation and the less-than-rosy picture that I shall outline before you, I feel confident that a reality check is necessary, so that new life and vigor can be infused in all of us in the challenging, evangelizing mission of the church today.

I. The Reality in Context

Three most recent surveys or studies (2000-2001) serve as directional compasses in charting a strategic response to the problems, issues and challenges faced by Catholic Education and the Catechetical Ministry in the Philippines today. They shall be presented in succession, in providing a bird’s eye-view of what I term “The Reality in Context.”

A. Youth Study 2001.

This is a study conducted nationwide by NFO – Trends for the Global Filipino Foundation, the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus and other entities. It sought to profile the Filipino Youth at the beginning of the 21st Century. The study covered home life, friends, lifestyle, hobbies, sources and utilization of money, media exposure, attitudes, beliefs and values. Via multi-stage probability in sample selection, 1,420 interviews were conducted with the youth, ranging from 7-21 years old. The respondents where drawn from the urban and rural settings; these are residents of three major geographical divisions of the country and Metro Manila, the premier and National Capital Region of the Philippines.

Respondents’ Socio-economic and Demographic Profile

The youth respondents are representative of what is popularly known as A, B, C, D, E Socio-economic stratified classes. Forty-seven percent (47%) are male, while fifty-three percent (53%) are female. Twenty – eight (28%) are out-of-school youth, four percent (4%) are married, and seven percent (7%) are in the workforce – involved as farmers, laborers, or craftsmen - to augment the daily family income. If considered as the microcosm of today’s Filipino youth, the profile raises some revealing data for serious examination. For example, almost one-third of today’s youth is out-of-school (28%) for reasons one can surmise as socio-economic in character. Poverty pushes the young to join the labor force, give up schooling, or get involved in petty criminal acts just to tide themselves over.
While the young are generally happy, sixty-two percent (62%) are somewhat happy. Their degree of happiness on a ten-point scale is 6.4. Only the AB classes seem to be happiest (8 or higher).

A relative majority is concerned with becoming better people, who are characteristically disciplined, patient, industrious, friendly and vice-free (51% of males and 42% of females). Altering appearance to be more attractive and becoming rich are poor second and third, respectively, in the youth’s ranked preferences.

Professional careers attract the youth of NCR and the upper middle class, gravitating towards managerial, executive positions. Teaching is a popular aspiration among many. Males are attracted to careers in the military service, engineering, and medical sciences. Females opt for the teaching and nursing professions. The downside to this is the fact that twenty-five percent (25%) of youth – respondents concede that their chances are dim in terms of their educational aspirations.

The young are early risers. Twenty-five percent (25%) are up by five a.m. Fifty percent (50%) are awake between five and six in the morning. In effect, seventy-five percent (75%) are up by six a.m. Majority have exercised autonomy at an early age. Mothers have control over those 13 – 15 years in age, but this dwindles to zero over those who are 19 – 21 years old.

The Catholic Church membership is seen to decrease in the next generation. Contrary to popular belief, the Philippines may no longer be a nation of believers. While a large majority (88%) still assert belief in God/Supreme Being, a minority (42%) acknowledges the existence of heaven and, much less, of hell (21%) and the after life (21%). Church involvement among the youth is low at eighteen percent (18%). If they do, they get involved in the Music ministry (81%) and altar/mass service (4%). Priests and nuns are trusted by seventy to seventy-three percent (70%-73%) of the youth, but as they grow in age, they become less trustful of priests and nuns. Surprisingly, the upper class has relatively low level of trust in priests and nuns even if the proportion of believers in this sector is higher than the lower classes. The Mindanao youth are less trustful of priests and nuns.

By and large, the Filipino youth take pride in certain Filipino qualities; they are seemingly lacking interest in national concerns. Eighty-seven percent (87%) worry over environmental problems. A quarter of the youth (24%) are ashamed of politics and corruption in government, the social climate, tardiness, the mañana habit, crab mentality, etc. But given a choice, eighty-two (82%) would still remain Filipinos, preferring it over other nationalities.

The youth survey’s concluding statement profiles the average Filipino youth as a myth in many aspects.

There are actually four defined worlds according to economic levels:

  • the upper class who have access to almost everything (AB =1%)
  • the middle class who own enough things to make life sufficiently comfortable (C = 5%)
  • the lower middle class who have enough access to TV and radio and if they are lucky, a few other facilities (D = 77%)
  • the lower class whose homes are so barren, they are lucky to have a radio (E = 17%)

The data also shows fluid progressions as the youth grows older, ushering palpable changes in their behavior and attitudes. For instance, something big happens when they are 16 or thereabouts. At this age, they make great leaps in their experimentations with life. By the time they are 19, they have become cynical about government, politics and life in general.

  • It is encouraging to know that the youth weave dreams about their future but, unfortunately, they do not want to continue dreaming because their economic realities put a wet blanket over their dreams and aspirations.
  • Their activities are highly functional and are lacking in variety, creativity, play or stimulation. There is a lot of time to gab, eat and just hang around even as they take on big responsibilities at home. They wish, however, that they could have more time for play and leisure.

Reading is not one of their passions. This habit has not been inculcated at home or in school. Moreover, there are very few interesting books to read at home and in school. Libraries are nearby but they do not contain the stuff that would interest the youth. The encouraging statistic is that given interesting books, the youth would be more inclined to read.

  • Home and family serve as their refuge but do not sufficiently offer the intellectual and emotional support that they need. Parents, while acknowledged to be good providers, are just equipped to deal with their psychological needs. Parents lack education and may not have the right priorities in life. As such, the youth, especially the older ones, seek deeper intimacies with their parents but end up frustrated. Not that their parents do not care, they just do not know how to address it. The youth say that their parents do not even know how to handle the youth’s exuberance when it comes to their love life. as a result, they run to their friends or peers who they trust with their deepest secrets. From their peers they learn what is the latest and what should what should be fun.
  • They hang out with their “barkadas” with whom they develop. We can imagine that there is a lot of interaction and assimilation within the groups. With the “barkada,” the youth develop rituals, manner and ways of conducting or even talking among themselves. It is almost like they are part of a tribe.
  • If lucky, the school serves as a surrogate home. They like school not only for the academic merits but also for the socialization that it provides. School allows them to be with people of their age and to listen to mentors who can help process their thoughts and feelings. The importance of good teachers to shower them the understanding and kindness that they seek cannot be overemphasized.
  • Media and technology are the other big things in their life with TV and radio having the highest reach. Technology is still a function of class, but the Internet cafés mushrooming in our midst will democratize their availability to the youth. Globalization will happen faster in this generation as the world opens up through media and technology. According to the youth with the Internet, they can learn about anything.
  • Sadly, national pride is not leveraged on substantive facts as shown in the youth’s shallow knowledge about history and the country’s heritage. They are not well linked with the community that they are in nor with social and political realities.

GO TO APPENDIX A (Youth Study 2001)


B. The Shape of Religious Education in the Philippines Today



The Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines, in partnership with the University of Sto. Tomas - Social Research Center conducted an empirical and representative survey of 1,173 member schools. The member schools surveyed constitute roughly thirty-two percent (32.31%) of the total number of member schools.

Salient features of the findings of the study appear encouraging and affirming. These are favorable to Catholic Education, but they reflect shadows upon closer scrutiny.

1. Goals of Education. The three top-ranking goals are

  • To foster in the students a stronger belief in God (Rank #1; frequency of 1108)
  • To cultivate in the students a sense of personal relationship with Christ (Rank #2; frequency of 837)
  • To nurture in the students a commitment to live their personal lives in accordance with the principles of Christian Morality ( Rank #3; frequency of 432)
  • Promotion of social justice and active involvement in parish and church affairs rank last among goals and objectives. This is worrisome.

2. Religious Education Programs contain formal Vision-Mission Statements (82.7%). This is a marked improvement when compared to the 1979 survey’s obtained result of 76.81%. In terms of formal plan, nine out of ten respondent schools (91.3%) have one, which details objectives to be pursued as well as means and resources needed for their attainment.

3. Eighty-nine percent (89%) have established RE offices. However, most of the offices are treated as one of the academic departments, thus limiting the range of influence RE brings to the formation of an environment that is distinctively Catholic. In effect, RE mainly consists in classroom instruction, formally conducted on a compulsory basis. Nevertheless, time allotment is two (2) hours of class per week in the elementary and secondary schools and three (3) hours in the tertiary level.

4. Content of Religious Education. Jesus Christ, His Life and Teachings, the Sacraments, and the Bible are definitely covered in 95% of respondent schools. Topics such as Death, Judgment and Eternity plus Original Sin may be sacrificed by 30% of respondent schools if time is running out. This will need depth review alongside the Youth Study 2001, pertinent to the young’s seeming unbelief of hell, heaven and the afterlife.

While 88% use the Catechism for Filipino Catholics, 70% use it with adaptations. Among users, 18.8% adhere to the CFC approach consisting of inculturation, integration and community-formation.

5. Agents of Religious Education. Survey findings show that the baccalaureate degrees of the teachers are almost equally divided into theology/religious education (49.2%) and other fields of specialization (50.8%). While this ratio is far below the 82.14% registered in the 1979 survey, 72.1% are graduate degree holders (masterate or doctorate) in the field, a marked improvement from the 21.74% recorded in the earlier survey.

The agents of Religious Education are satisfied (92.6%) in the ministry, 38% of which are very satisfied. Ninety-five percent (95.1%) view the administration as supportive. In fact, 54.7% claim that the administration is very supportive of Religious Education.

As role models, RE faculty are perceived as satisfactory models when compared to others in the school setting. Their degree of influence ranged from 98% to 99.5%.

6. Religious Education and its Influence. Students perceive Religious Education as effective. Their rating ranged as follows: 95% among college students; 97% among respondent HS students; and 98% among elementary pupils. The School environment was judged of considerable influence in their religious formation. Among college students, the school environment’s degree of much influence is 64.2%, 71.6% among HS students, and 74% among elementary pupils. This is lower than the aforecited degree of influence of RE in the religious formation of the young. The difference is approximated as between 24% to 30%.

Summarily, the status of RE in Catholic Schools today, when analyzed vis-à-vis the Youth Study 2001, reveals valuable data that Religious Education practitioners can use in providing concrete interventions toward integral faith formation in the young of the new century.

GO TO APPENDIX B (The Shape of Religious Education in the Philippines Today)


 

C. National Survey on the Catechetical Situation in the Pastoral Setting

 

The two-pronged National Catechetical Survey (2000) was launched for two reasons:

  • To evaluate the situation objectively in light of the 1988-1989 Survey on the same subject;
  • To plan appropriately for the future.
    The partial returns constitute thirty – five percent of a total of 2,242 questionnaires released to the parishes.

1. General Situation in Respondent Parishes

In the respondent parishes, the over-all population is pegged at 22.6 million, 18.1 million of which are Catholics. The public school population is 5.2 million, 4.16 million of which are Catholic. Seventy – five percent (75%) or 3.9 million are elementary pupils, while 1.3 million or twenty-five percent (25%) are in High School.

2. Catechetical Agents

Catechists in the public schools number 15,260, while those in the pastoral setting are 5,726. Their number is considerably small (20,986) compared to the student population of 22.6 million.
The Catechetical agents’ profile show that 19,227 are lay catechists, the majority of which are Elementary and High School graduates. Seventy – eight percent (78%) of Grade School catechists and fifty – nine percent (59%) of High School catechists are undergraduates. In short, they have not earned college degrees. How ready are they to meet the Catechetical challenge for the new century?

3. Average Duration of Religious Instruction Per Week

Classes in the public elementary schools range from thirty to ninety minutes per week (87.5%) and forty to sixty minutes on the average (40.7%) in public high schools.

4. Degree of Involvement of Local Catholic Schools

The involvement and/or participation of Catholic Schools in the parish setting is minimal (25%). It is slightly higher in the public school setting (31%). The high percentage of no response (69% - parish statistic and 60% for public schools) is interesting and arresting. On the other hand, this raises disturbing questions.

5. Areas Needing Attention

Among many, the Catechetical Ministry in the Parish Setting is beset with myriad demands that are both material and human. Resource mobilization becomes of paramount concern to insure the missionary character of the Catechetical Ministry. Reflected below is a list of areas needing attention that were identified by the respondents. If addressed, this could arrest drop – outs among the ranks of professional, non-professional and volunteer catechists:

  • Funding _____________________________ 45.7%
  • Recruitment __________________________ 42.5%
  • Formation of Catechists _________________ 37.5%
  • Catechetical Materials __________________ 30.9%
  • Awareness of Parishioners _______________ 18.5%
  • Relations with Public School Authorities ____ 6.8%
  • Relations with Catholic School Authorities __ 4.8%


6. Catechetical / Instructional Needs
While it may be true that no teaching-learning tool can replace on effective teacher, every catechist, besides ongoing formation, needs a pool of catechetical materials as aids in the teaching – learning process. The following had been listed based on the frequency distribution scale:

  • Religion Textbook for learners _________ 44.9%
  • AV equipment & programs_____________ 41.2%
  • Activity Sheets for Students ___________ 35.5%
  • References for Catechists ______________ 35.3%
  • Lesson plans _______________________ 29.5%
  • Syllabi _____________________________ 29.5%

Summarily, the partial data reveal an approximate realistic picture of the catechetical situation in the Philippine pastoral setting. Nationwide, some features of the landscape, such as the following, pose points for deep reflection and a challenge to the entire Christian Community:

  • Large percentage of lay catechists
  • Very high percentage of high school and elementary graduates among lay catechists
  • Inconvenient schedule is the main reason for non-attendance at religion classes
  • Forty minutes is the average duration of religious instruction per week in public schools
  • Inadequacy of teaching materials is the main difficulty of catechists
  • Funding, recruitment and formation of catechists, and catechetical materials are areas needing immediate attention.
  • Textbooks and learning aids for student use are major concerns.
  • Degree of involvement of local Catholic Schools in public schools, parish catechesis, and non-denominational schools is worrisome

GO TO APPENDIX C (National Survey on the Catechetical Situation in the Pastoral Setting)


 

D. Survey Summation


Ten years after the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, in the recently – concluded National Pastoral Consultation on Church Renewal, identified nine priorities. Most, if not all, have a direct bearing on Catechesis and Catholic Education.

If Integral Faith Formation is top priority in the Church of the Philippines, in-depth comparative analysis, reflection and interpretation of these three survey reports are in order. Since the latter two surveys are focused on the RE and Catechetical landscape, data reveal that religious education and catechetical instruction are primarily, although not exclusively, school - based. At this point, it is noteworthy to cite that only about nine percent (9%) of catholic students are enrolled in catholic schools. Where are the ninety - one percent (91%)? Therefore, family and adult catechesis are alternatives for depth exploration in the quest for integral evangelization that will touch “all strata of humanity.”

It is premature to draw conclusions from the survey findings, given the constraints posed by time and some statistical limitations. However, a quick look at the data can provide information that is vital in the generation of a transformative curriculum that gives importance to integral human development, service and human promotion, and social transformation. Thus, faith - life - culture integration is progressively achieved. A shift of focus, worldview and priorities appears inevitable if we hope to “breathe evangelization” in a Local Church that is promotive of the Asian soul.

 


II. Strategic Response


Framed against the preceding survey reports, I noted that the strategic plan prepared by the Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education (ECCCE) concretely serves as an immediate response to the challenges and issues that surfaced through the said surveys / studies. I shall now present this strategic plan in capsule form.

MAJOR PROGRAMS OF ECCCE

• The acronym NCDP stands for “National Catechetical Directory of the Philippines”. This is a book, which contains sets of theoretical principles, doctrinal orientations, and practical guidelines on all that pertains to the religious instructions and catechetical apostolate in the Philippines.

The Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education prepared it in the years 1979 – 83. It was approved by the Vatican authorities in 1984 and published in 1985.

After 15 years since its publication, this “Directory” is being updated because of the many changes that have taken place in all areas of life in the Philippines particularly catechesis – and also to bring it into line with the latest publications on the matter issued by the competent Vatican authorities.

• The acronyms CFC and KPK stand for “Catechism for Filipino Catholics” and “Katekismo para sa mga Pilipinong Katoliko,” respectively. These are the National Catechism in English and Filipino.

The former was completed and approved by the Vatican Authorities in 1997, while the latter is its translation into the national language and was published in the year 2000.

After the Bible, and together with the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), this National Catechism is the main source book for the preparation of Religion textbooks and programs for the teaching of religion in the Philippines.

Given the novelty of its approach and features, and of much of its content, this book needs to be presented to the catechists and religion teachers in order to be properly utilized. This is achieved through the publication of a “Companion to the CFC” Vol. II (Vol. I has already been published), and the setting up of a “Speakers’ Bureau” which is a pool of resource persons available to conduct seminar / workshops on the CFC / KPK throughout the country.

• EEMLC is an acronym which stands for “Essential Elements of Minimum Learning Competencies in Religion.”

This is a set of specific guidelines concerning the content of the programs of religious education in Elementary, High School and College levels.

The purpose of these EEMLC in religious education is to offer guidelines to the authors of Religion textbooks concerning the minimum elements of the Catholic faith in the areas of Doctrine, Morals and Worship to be included in the religious education program for each level.
These same guidelines are also useful for school Administrators and Religion teachers in evaluating teaching materials for Religion classes as well as existing Religious Education Programs.

The preparation of these EEMLC will entail considerable consultation among experts in Catechesis and Education to bring it on a par with a similar instrument prepared by the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) for all other subjects taught in schools at the different levels.

The EEMLC will become operative only after it has been formally approved by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines.

• The Catechists’ Welfare and Development is a very urgent necessity in the Philippines. In fact, in spite of the fact that the Catechists are among the most important agents in the Christian formation of the People of God, especially children and youths, thy are very poorly remunerated, and their specific training is often inadequate.

The great majority of the catechists are volunteers who sometimes receive only a transportation allowance.
As a first step toward improving the situation, ECCCE and Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP) have decided to set up an organization called “Phil-CARE Foundation” whose main purpose is the development of catechists.

“Phil-CARE” stands for “Philippine Catechists and Religion Educators” It is the joint enterprise of the ECCCE and the CEAP and derives its financial resources only from voluntary donations from organizations and individuals. Phil-CARE will also extend its assistance to Religion Teachers who volunteer to teach Religion in the public schools and in the parish setting where they find themselves in the same situation as the volunteer catechists.

• Formation of Catechists and Religion Teachers

The proper intellectual and moral formation of Catechists and Religion Teacher as well as their skill training, is an essential part of their development and a very urgent priority in the Philippines, for a very small percentage of these categories of people have received adequate academic and practical training for their ministry as teachers of the faith.

As a first step in training a better formation of catechists and religion Teachers, ECCCE and the CEAP have decided to prepare an essential syllabus / program for their formation.

The Catechists already have their CBFP (Catechists’ Basic Formation Program) since 1992. But this Program needs to be revised and updated to bring it in line with the content of the CFC and the changed situations in the country. The RTBFM (Religion Teachers’ Basic Formation Manual) needs to be prepared. This manual will spell out the required standardized content of the formation of the Religion Teachers, which up to now has been left to the individual institutions offering such formation courses.

Such a standardized RTBFM will be of great help to the universities and other learning institutions which train the Religion Teachers and will ensure that all those teaching religion in Catholic schools have the required theoretical and practical formation.

• Relationship between ECCCE and other related institutions, such as CEAP, Manila Archdiocesan and Parochial Schools Association (MAPSA), (Manila) Archdiocesan Catechetical Ministry (ACM), Diocesan Catechetical Offices and Catechetical Training Centers, as well as DECS.

A smooth relationship between ECCCE and these institutions / offices, and a regular flow of information is indispensable in view of the needed collaboration in the areas of common concern.

• Catechetical Development in transparochial communities and other settings

The religious formation of these organizations / communities has so far been left to each individual group, and has often been inadequate.

It has also been noted that many of these organizations do not make use for their formation the National Catechism and other resources prepared by the ECCCE. Better coordination and a more systematic use of the officially approved resource materials for the formation of adult Catholics is necessary. This can be achieved trough proper coordination with these organizations and the Bishops / priests in charge.

• Advocacy

These concerns of ECCCE, CEAP and MAPSA which needs to be brought to the knowledge of the nation in order to give the correct and complete information, as well as to enlist the necessary support for the different activities undertaken.

To that effect, a regular flow of information fed to the national and local media is to be promoted.

In parting, I wish to say that much more can be done, once the survey reports have been fully analyzed and properly reflected upon in silence and prayer. We, in the ministry of Catechesis and Catholic Education, value your patience and attentive listening. We are all partners in the mission of integral evangelization. May the reign and peace of our Lord dwell upon us always.

“… the Spirit is at the origin of the noble ideas and undertakings
which benefit humanity on its journey through history.
‘The Spirit of God with marvelous foresight directs the course
of the ages and renews the face of the earth.’”
(John Paul II, Redemptoris Missio, 1990)

Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines

Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education

CBCP Bldg., 470 Gen Luna St., Intramuros, 1002 Manila Philippines
Tel. No. +632 5274161
Fax No. +632 5275417
Email: eccce@cbcpworld.com

   

 

HOME | ABOUT US | MINISTRY | LOCAL ASSOCIATIONS | MODULES | PROGRAMS | PUBLICATIONS | EVENTS


Copyright © 2004 Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education. All rights reserved.
Usage outside our Permissions Guidelines requires our prior written consent.

free page hit counter